Get the Flash Player to see this player.

VIDEO: Fence divides Papaikou over “The Mill”

May 15, 2010 | Hamakua Coast

Surfers protest owner’s right to close access to cherished beach on their private pathway

Video by David Corrigan

An apparent call to arms over what the news has called a “misunderstanding” led to a roadside protest on Friday, as surfers and others who use the privately owned path to the popular Papaikou beach spot – known as “The Mill” – lashed out over the owner’s right to close the walkway.

State law allows anyone to use any beach, but access is sometimes a different issue. In the case of the Mill, most users take advantage of an open manhole in a fence that leads to a path towards the relatively secluded shoreline. The path is part of the property of Charlene Prickett and her husband, James Waugh, who purchased the property in 1995. Before they owned it, it was part of the C. Brewer plantation lands, which have blurred the lines of public and private through years along the Hamakua Coast.

The gate is closed at 6:30 pm everyday, and is even closed on certain holidays. A list of signs and rules are posted – like No Dogs Allowed – for those who choose to use the pathway.

On Friday, the protesters held signs and spray painted surfboards, angry that the owners have dominion over the only access to the Mill available to the public (besides by sea) and argued that the pathway should be made into an easement for them to use.

Reports that some surfers have been arrested recently for jumping the fence have fueled the fire.

Prickett and Waugh also own the narrow Mill Road that leads from Pinky’s down to the dead end where the path to the beach begins, and have complained of illegal parking along the roadway.

Officials with the County of Hawaii hope a possible community meeting to be held in the future will help settle the situation.

In this video, Hilo surfer Demian Barrios explains why he and his friends are protesting the limited access, while attorney and DJ Damir Kouliev represents the “other side of the fence”, explaining that the management of the fence is entirely up to its owners. Kouliev and the owner of the controversial pathway both told Big Island Video News that Kouliev has not officially been retained by the owners to represent their side of the issue. Kouliev also said that he was trying to gather interested individuals to clean the beach in an attempt to put a positive spin on the contentious scenario. He said anyone interested in helping can contact him through malamapapaikoubeach@gmail.com.

Up on the highway, sign wavers were promoting another online resource … a petition for public beach access at Papaikou at http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/public-beach-access-to-papaikou-mill.html


facebook comments:

There are "4 comments" on this Article:

  1. kawika says:

    mahalo for the video. One morning we jumped the fence (in the dark) to go surf, somebody came outside and looked at us cause his dog was barking. but he never said anything.. why? cause its not our fault his ass never opened the gate early enough!! who are they to deny the youth???

  2. LEI says:

    HEY SURFERS AND BEACH GOERS…YOU HAVE ALL THE RIGHT TO GO TO THE PAPAIKOU MILL TO DO THE PLEASURES IN LIFE…SAD THE TWO PEOPLE WHO ACT LIKE THEY RICH AND CAN OWN LOCALS THAT IS SUPER SAD…THEY MIGHT HAVE MONEY BUT THEY HAVE NO HEART…PLEASE COUNCIL PEOPLE HELP US LOCALS TO GO HAVE FUN AT OUR BEACH…TELL THAT SO CALLED GRUMBLERS TO BUILD A WALL SO THEY CANNOT SEE WHO IS COMING AND GOING OUT OF THE BEACH AREA….OH GOSH US LOCALS HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO BE THERE AND HAVE OUR FUN…

  3. elemakule says:

    Landowners in Hawai’i that live near the ocean just need to accept the fact that with the luxury of being able to live there they will have to provide access to these areas. This isn’t Wyoming or Rhode Island…it’s an island with a finite coastline that should be available for everyone, not just the rich. If they want to obstruct access then they need to consider moving to Costa Rica or somewhere else.

  4. Artist says:

    In watching the video one sees 4 or 5 surfers leaving the trail and cutting thru the bushes. IDK if the bushes are the owners property but I would assume so. It appears that the owners are trying to accomodate those who want to go to the beach but that some abuse their rights to privacy

Comment on this article through WordPress: