Big Island Video News

Serving Hawaii County

  • Hawaiʻi Island News Regions
    • Hamakua
      • Mauna Kea
    • Hilo
    • Kau
    • Kona
    • Kohala
    • Puna

Video courtesy Na Leo TV, edited by Big Island Video News

VIDEO: TMT Case – Judge Heen Questioned On Hawaiian Kingdom
Avatar photo

by Big Island Video News
on Dec 11, 2016 at 6:30 pm

Subscribe to Big Island Video News (FREE)

* indicates required

STORY SUMMARY

HILO (BIVN) - The hearing officer did not allow the line of questioning having to do with a landmark ruling Heen made in 1994.

HILO, Hawaii – A few participants in the Thirty Meter Telescope hearing seized the opportunity to put retired judge Walter Meheula Heen on the spot about the Hawaiian Kingdom during cross-examination on December 2.

Heen was appearing as a witness for the University of Hawaii in support of the conservation district use permit for placing the TMT observatory on Mauna Kea.

“Your honor, Judge Heen,” asked Dexter Kaiama, attorney for the participating organization KAHEA: The Hawaiian-Environmental Alliance, “does the Kingdom of Hawaii continue to exist?”

The university objected, and hearing officer Judge Riki May Amano (ret) sustained the objection, saying the line of questioning was beyond the scope of Heen’s testimony.

Kaiama has made subject matter jurisdiction arguments in Hawaii courts in the past. A past State of Hawai‘i Intermediate Court of Appeals decision by Heen is a critical piece to Kaiama’s legal approach.

In 1994, Judge Heen authored a landmark ruling in State of Hawai‘i v. Lorenzo dealing with subject matter jurisdiction, in which Heen concluded it is incumbent on a Defendant to present conclusive evidence that the Hawaiian Kingdom still exists in order to have a case dismissed by claiming that the State of Hawaii has no jurisdiction over the Defendant.

The ruling opened the door for the research of Hawai‘i political scientist David Keanu Sai, Ph.D., to provide “a factual (or legal) basis for concluding that the Kingdom exists as a state,” to be used as evidence in order to dismiss cases due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

On March 5, 2015, Judge Joseph E. Cardoza of the Second Circuit Court on the Island of Maui took judicial notice of Dr. Sai’s legal brief titled, “The Continuity of the Hawaiian State and the Legitimacy of the acting Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom,” at the request of the defense in State v. English, known as the case of the Molokai fishermen. The defense attorney in the case was Dexter Kaiama.

Other TMT contested case participants also tried to question Judge Heen on his landmark ruling, with a similar lack of success.


Filed Under: Uncategorized Tagged With: Dexter Kaiama, Mauna Kea, Riki May Amano, Thirty Meter Telescope, TMT Contested Case, Walter Heen

LATEST NEWS

Hawaiʻi County Blesses Four More New Ambulances

Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle Breeding Sites Found In Kona

Report Of Unexploded Ordnance On Old Saddle Road

Fatal House Fire In Puna Under Investigation

Kīlauea Volcano Eruption Update for Monday, July 7

Governor Green Issues Final Veto List

About Big Island Video News

  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Dynamik-Gen on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in